with my warmest regards
-
Enter at your own risk
e-mail ME:
SondraKisP*at*Gmail*dot*com
Claire*at*e-biscuit*dot*com
e-mail DougM:
dougmkisp*at*nc*dot*rr*dot*com
celebrity ton of s**t
September 25, 2016 –
This truly delicious flip perfectly defines the empty argument so beloved of people who earn themselves a fortune almost solely via a make-believe world of fictional imagery and made-up words.
Their argument is totally without form and void, so it’s usable by anyone with any agenda.
An-y-one (as shown).
Does this podium make me look short?
September 25, 2016 –
Awfergeezisfriggin…
H> wants man-size and woman-size podiumsa?
Not sure if this qualifies as affirmative-action politics or Procrustean politics.
Hillary Clinton …, who is 5-foot-4, has apparently enlisted the help of a raised podium for the first presidential debate against Donald Trump, who is 6-foot-3, Monday night, photos of the two podiums show. [O]ne of the two podiums inside the debate hall … is larger than the other. It is believed that the larger one was built at Clinton’s request to make her appear taller than she is.
“Clinton is 5’4″ and Trump 6’2″ and her team wanted the podium modified or a box added so she won’t look short next to Trump,” ….
“One is clearly larger … than the other,” …. Photos … appear to show two podiums of two different sizes. [story]
Why not just whip ‘em out an’ see whose is bigger?
Trump doesn’t have a hair on his @ss if he doesn’t bring out a box of his own to stand on.
It’s the kind of psywar stuff he advocates during business negotiations.
UPDATE: Oh, and another ideer — tippytoes.
Mebbe he should just go over and help her clamber up onto her box.
A gentleman would do that… and suppress his smirk while doing so.
Next debate, make ‘em swap podiums at half-time.
(What? Nah, Hillary always wins coin-tosses. Alllways.)
showdown
September 24, 2016 –
sometimes known as the debate run-up
~ story ~
________
Yeah, I know, mixed metaphors (duel vs poker); but, hey, it’s a weekend.
Okay, so J Gennifer’s not goin’, but the joke’s still valid.
Actually, it’s gettin even ‘better:
Juanita Broaddrick
Paula Jones
Kathleen Willey
Can’t make this stuff up, folks.
________
UPDATE: 
Spelling correction, Darryl Darrell
ToDaZed Sophistry Sircus
September 23, 2016 –
Friday Dump
In an April 5, 2016 interview with the FBI, Abedin was shown an email exchange between Clinton and Obama, but the longtime Clinton aide did not recognize the name of the sender.
“Once informed that the sender’s name is believed to be pseudonym used by the president, Abedin exclaimed: ‘How is this not classified?‘” the report says. “Abedin then expressed her amazement at the president’s use of a pseudonym and asked if she could have a copy of the email.”
[for her collection?… or …]
Yes. They said that Obobo — sitting POTUS Obobo — was emailing his sitting SecState using a fake name.
I’ll give ya a minute to get past all that that implies . . .
Now: Friday Nite Follies demands we come up with the fake name Obobo was using.
[since the admittedly way-kewl Carlos Danger was already taken…]
ToDaZeD IDNTTWMWYTIM
September 23, 2016 –
definitions, pee-pole!!
…At an event in New York City called “Building Progressive, Inclusive Cities,” terror attack are “part and parcel of life in a big city,” [London mayor, Sadiq] Khan told the Evening Standard just hours after police foiled multiple terror attacks in New Jersey and New York.
…In other words, terrorism is the new normal.
Your “Progressive, Inclusive” Utopia is a real winner if it pisses people off so badly that
terror attacks must be viewed as “part and parcel of life in a big city.”
Well done, that.
weee-ooo-weee-ooo-weee-ooo
September 22, 2016 –
Protesters massed on Charlotte’s streets for a third night Thursday in the latest sign of mounting pressure for police to release video that could resolve wildly different accounts of the shooting of a black man.
Demonstrators chanted “release the tape” and “we want the tape” while briefly blocking an intersection near Bank of America headquarters…
The first fresco displays a wide array of occult symbols, some directly referring to Freemasonry. This is quite astonishing as the painting is in the lobby of the headquarters of the United States’ most predominant bank and not in a Masonic lodge … but perhaps there is some overlap. Those who are “in the know” and initiated to the Mysteries are those who are qualified to accomplishing the planning process, which in this painting seem to be the men in suits, whose ties match the red and white checker-board floor, and who make plans for the future generation, represented by the blond Masonic boy.
In the second fresco, civil unrest, riots, protests and repression are all taking place. Historically, the masses only usually go into an outright revolt when their living conditions deteriorate significantly or when hugely unpopular policies get adopted. Does this piece refer to the loss of civil liberties and the rise of a police state? There is also a metaphysical aspect to the image, represented by the spinning naked bodies that appear as the sun, implying that the period turmoil is also happening on a cosmic level.
The last fresco gives a sense of “mission accomplished”, with the dominant figure surveying the work, while also conveying the message that “the work is never totally done” as labourers are still hard at work in the underground. This is reminiscent of the movie Metropolis, where a class of workers silently slave away underground to sustain the elite’s utopia. I also can’t help but being reminded of the 33 Chilean miners while looking at those workers …
like nails on a chalkboard
September 22, 2016 –
You worthless bumpkins have failed her again,
and she is not amused (or playin’ with a full deck, apparently).
We’ve seen it before
Cultural ref
Hands up, don’t kick!
September 22, 2016 –
