so there’s tHAT

17 Comments!

  1. Claire: dirty, dirty wingnut
    Posted May 8, 2011 at 9:29 pm |

    o_0 o_O

  2. LLoyd
    Posted May 8, 2011 at 10:16 pm |

    Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!1

    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much
    Toooooooo Much Sondra is Toooooooooooooo Much

  3. PatrickP
    Posted May 8, 2011 at 10:23 pm |

    Ha! Where did you get that picture?

  4. logdogsmith
    Posted May 8, 2011 at 10:24 pm |

    Those hats are used to control the minds of people who frequent the link below.

  5. OldBB
    Posted May 8, 2011 at 10:40 pm |

    So that’s what an “asshat” looks like!

  6. Posted May 9, 2011 at 5:30 am |

    Cosmic!

  7. bocopro
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 5:43 am |

    And the other side of fodosciapping:

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-X7ZqUl4bBNQ/Tcbp52bYwtI/AAAAAAAAFDA/9fRFBdZ2yRo/s320/0508114.jpg

  8. geezerette
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 6:11 am |

    If that young lady knew what a stir that hat would cause? Not the one she intended I’m sure— It looks as if she started a trend. A new status symbol I ask???

  9. dick not quite dead white guy
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 7:24 am |

    More teletubbies.

  10. SondraK, naughty naughty bad wingnut
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 7:45 am |

    Dammit, Rodgie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Dammit! Dammit! Dammit!

  11. Posted May 9, 2011 at 9:34 am |

    I know

  12. mech
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 11:41 am |

    The contractor told them that the hats would enhance their 5D video system depth perception.

    After teh precedent’s tiff about not having a cool enough phone in the oval office, they wanted to be certain of having the latest hypercool (like in ’24′) technology for this event.

  13. DougM (jackassophobe)
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 1:44 pm |

    [counts silently to self]
    Wellp … the way I see it, it’s 25:1 white folk.
    Not a whole lot’a diversity bein’ exhibited by the example-in-chief, looks like t’me.
    Just sayin’.

  14. geezerette
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 4:11 pm |

    He’s the onlyest one and he’s 1/2 n 1/2–

  15. Posted May 9, 2011 at 4:29 pm |

    Oh, look – it’s a group photo of the Ministry of Silly Hats.

  16. DougM (jackassophobe)
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 5:34 pm |

    geezerette (13),
    Yep, I see 13 people, including Obama.
    That makes it 12-1/2:1/2, or 25:1.
    (What? Yeah, I peaked at sixth-grade math.)

  17. PeggyU
    Posted May 9, 2011 at 10:33 pm |

    Shouldn’t there be one of those Obama O’s in the middle of those hats? Looks like there is a space for it.

    BTW, a friend of mine who pays attention to that royal stuff said that Beatrice and her sister wore goofy hats to protest the fact that their mother was not included in the wedding party. I don’t know if that’s true or not, but it’s an odd way of expressing annoyance.