slippery slopes
[NYT] The share of benefits [gubbmint dependency dollars] flowing to the least affluent households, the bottom fifth, has declined from 54 percent in 1979 to 36 percent in 2007, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis published last year.
…Politicians have expanded the safety net without a commensurate increase in revenues, a primary reason for the government’s annual deficits and mushrooming debt. In 2000, federal and state governments spent about 37 cents on the safety net from every dollar they collected in revenue, … A decade later, … spending on the safety net consumed nearly 66 cents of every dollar of revenue.
…Almost half of all Americans lived in households that received government benefits in 2010, according to the Census Bureau. The share climbed from 37.7 percent in 1998 to 44.5 percent in 2006, before the recession, to 48.5 percent in 2010.
When the earned-income credit was introduced in 1975, eligibility was limited to households making the current equivalent of up to $26,997. In 2010, it was available to families making up to $49,317. The maximum payout, meanwhile, quadrupled on an inflation-adjusted basis.























5 Comments!
Iranians go “BOOM!” in Bangkok :
(Interesting little story, mojo. ‘Tis true – our greatest asset is the terrorists’ own stoopidity and incompetence.)
Politicians have expanded the safety net …
Safety net? Or hammock?
Or, more likely, a snare with no easy escape …..
The wife of a friend of mine stormed into the local school office demanding that their children get subsidized (free?) lunches. The school agreed probably just to get her out of there. Their house is appraised at 1.6MM, they own two BMWs and a Land Rover, a boat, etc… Yes I would say that tax bribe money is flowing to the wrong people.
When the takers can out-vote the makers, the fall will begin.
Greece – coming to a theater near you this summer.