today’s celebrity haute couture wtf

( * )


  1. Melissa In Texas
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 10:34 am |

    I believe that Moo’s SPANX lost the battle.

  2. DougM (jackassophobe)
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 10:38 am |

    I see Lady Obama has that whole Crusader chain maille thing goin’ on.

  3. mech
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 10:40 am |

    In the next frame did Taylor Swift spew?

    I would have in that situation.

    That’s the creepiest pic of the lot.

    Caption contest please.

  4. Claire: barbarian, etc
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 10:47 am |

    Yanno that part of Alice wherein all the courtiers wear fake, ugly noses, etc. so they won’t be prettier than the Queen.

    MO; yer doin’ it worng.

  5. Ironic in Denver
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 11:48 am |

    a) Please tell me these are publicity photos from a new b-movie with a title something like “Bizarre Aliens from the Planet WTF.”

    b) Is there an Oscar for “most over-the-top behavior and dress?”

    c) Madonna actually makes Michelle look good. How is that possible?

    d) If I were a lesbian, I’d be hoping that no one was thinking about me when they saw those pics.

    PS: for those who are thinking that Romney is no better than Obama, I’m just going to say one thing: First Lady!

  6. bocopro
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 11:52 am |

    O.K. I know . . . I know — I promised no more song parodies. But they make it so damned EASY!!!

    To the melody of Cher’s “Gypsies, Tramps & Thieves” (excerpt)

    She gets dressed in an alley with a liberal ho’
    Her husband grins and lies for the money they throw
    Hated white men in her Princeton years
    Wrote it in a paper
    Spends taxpayer money on cheap souvenirs

    Rednecks, cracker trash
    She sees it in the faces on TV
    They’re all just
    Right-wing racist nuts
    And every day a new va-cay she’ll decree
    Another shopping spree

  7. Ironic in Denver
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 12:01 pm |

    Caption contest please.

    * “Michelle! The cameras are on.”
    * “Okay, Michelle, but no tongue.”
    * “I’d love to, but I have an STD.”
    * “I don’t do girls.”
    * “Just give me your number, I’ll be like JFK, but all girl.”
    * “The snaps are right there in the back.”
    * “Sure I’d love to have your baby.”

    okay…. I’m stuck in a rut here. Let’s see, how about….

    “Michelle, aren’t you kinda famous to be a groupie?”

  8. Joebandmember
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 12:42 pm |

    I gotta go and puke.

  9. DougM (jackassophobe)
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 2:24 pm |

    • Taylor Swift: Let me put in words you’ll understand, “Un-uhh, girlfrien’.”

    • Taylor Swift: So, you’re as bent as your ol’ man, then, eh?

    • Taylor Swift: The only reason you’re not writhing on the floor with a broken arm right now is the Secret Service. Now back… thufuque… offff.

    • Taylor Swift: Gahh… You even smell like a crooked lawyer from Chicago who married into power.

  10. geezerette
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 2:44 pm |

    What in the f ”’ ing hell is that??? Where the hell did she wear that? Talk about thumbing their noses at us!!!

  11. rickn8or
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 5:20 pm |

    Geezerette, don’t you know Mooshell is the Second Coming of Jackie?

    Didn’t think so.

  12. Thomas M.
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 5:32 pm |

    Looks like Taylor is trying to escape. First time I’ve ever seen her not want to hug someone.

    I hope O’Reilly does a body english segment on that one.

  13. SondraK, Queen of my domain
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 6:14 pm |

    I am very proud of this post :)

  14. snap-e-tom
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 6:28 pm |

    now i know what spanx are

  15. dick, not quite dead white guy
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 8:36 pm |

    Holy fuggin shit!! Who left the gate to the pig sty open?
    What is this? A trailer for the new Mad Max: The Dom Lesbian Years?
    Joan of Arc Meets Barbarella?
    Godzilla and the Skanks?
    Sheesh. How the hell can any First Lady even consider appearing in public wearing that?
    Po’ white trash. Rich black trash.

  16. Claire: barbarian, etc
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 10:13 pm |

    Yanno…. I think, on the original, that little skirt thingie was supposed to close in the front.

  17. LLoyd
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 10:28 pm |

    This was a 10+ fer sure Sndra. I puked when I saw the pic last night. As I saw it from her thighs up from the award and I was waiting for the vertical line in her v-section to have a major malfunction. The pics you chose are screamers. LOL

  18. Spin
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 1:08 am |

    She wore that to the Nickelodeon Kids’ Choice Awards.

    She flashed that moose-knuckle at children ferchrissakes!

  19. geezerette
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 6:25 am |

    Bet she bought that at Target– just to be like the rest of us girly folks.

  20. Ironic in Denver
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 9:24 am |

    Okay, this might be tacky, but:

    In general, I am, naturally, in favor of a good view of attractive female legs (and pretty much anything else female as well).

    However, ill fitting hose on, well, less than fabulous legs, does not qualify as a sight I wish to see.

    That said, and call me old-fashoned if you please, I DO NOT want to see or hear of the public display of the thighs of the First Lady of the United States — EVER. This has NOTHING to do with party affiliation or politics, for God’s sake!

    Does this woman have no sense of proprietary, much less fashion?

    Someone said quite a while back that whoever is in charge of her wardrobe must hate this woman. Here’s more proof.

    Actually, the thought that half the country thinks this is all great is more troubling to me than this woman’s missing sense of good taste and common sense.

    PS: what will be next? A Maxim front cover with a sitting president posing in nothing but a leather jockstrap? Flexing metrosexual muscles to show how great he is….. er, wait, that’s sorta like Russia…. that message to the Russians about “having more flexibility after the election” may not have been about missile defense after all….

  21. Ironic in Denver
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 9:33 am |

    Speaking of first ladies, most of you folks have probably seen this; but for those who haven’t, it’s worth reading in full:

    Bear in mind this is Politico. But still, worth reading.

    Didn’t much like that comment about Michelle being a “fashion icon” though; icon of what? Bad taste? Oh well, unlike Ann Romney, Michelle is a Hollywood groupie….

    (I realize that this doesn’t seem like much of a high bar, but it would be sooooooo nice, come January, to have a first lady which a cheerful demeanor and who knows how to dress in public. Callista? Er…. not anticipating her, though she’d be an improvement too….)

  22. bocopro
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 9:35 am |

    “I DO NOT want to see or hear of the public display of the thighs of the First Lady of the United States — EVER. This has NOTHING to do with party affiliation or politics”

    Let me add to that, if I may, public discussion of the bedroom habits of the President, whoever he/she might be

    We want an active,vigorous, biologically human individual calling the shots from the Oval Office, and those characteristics are directly associated with a healthy sexual appetite.

    What we don’t want is CBS or NBC or Comedy Central or ESPN or MTV or CBN or even Fox making an issue of libido potusiensis. And besides that, it ain’t anybody’s goddam business ‘cept them what’s doin it.

  23. TomR, armed in Texas
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 10:55 am |

    FLOTUS has taken the profession of slob to a higher level. Even Hillary pretty much maintained the dignity of her First Lady status. The Bush wives, Mrs. Carter, Nancy Reagan all maintained the dignity of the position of First Lady. Jackie Kennedy was admired around the world. But this thing we have now at 1600 Penn. Ave. is almost beyond description. She is classless but crass. Pure crap. I think she is just a cover to make Benito Hussein appear hetro. And it ain’t working!

  24. Tmw
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 11:01 am |

    Michelle Obama – first First Lady to wear a codpiece.

    As Michelle Malkin said: “Hooker chic.”

  25. SondraK, Queen of my domain
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 11:07 am |


  26. Jess
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 12:06 pm |

    It kind of reminds me of a spider before it bites a june bug.

  27. Lulu
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 2:28 pm |

    Lost in translation, or as one wag put it “The Zipper to Nowhere”.

    The full frontal view of Mooch in that getup is emetic. The tight sheer elasticized leggings reveal her underpants, her belly bulges, and the fact that they were too tight to fit her legs smoothly in the thighs, so there are the kind of horizontal wrinkles that occur with too-long panty hose. And you can see her underpants/Spanx at the apex of the split in the jacket, above the top of the leggings.

    A visual train wreck.

  28. Lulu
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 2:30 pm |

    Proves that the glam dames in “Desperate Housewives” aren’t the only ones who are desperate. Moochelle as cougar? Major fail.

  29. Ironic in Denver
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 2:47 pm |

    A new caption: (Michelle looking down)

    “Does this enormous split in my clothes make me look fat?”

    “Does my clever fashion choice make me look 14?”

  30. Ironic in Denver
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 2:48 pm |

    Truth to tell, those weirdos MO’s hanging with don’t look much better.

  31. Ironic in Denver
    Posted April 2, 2012 at 2:51 pm |

    libido potusiensis

    Oh wow. (Starts checking Internet for possible bookings to some other planet.)