move along. nothing to see.
Obama’s DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorney’s fees since “none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in” how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a “series of emails” between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:
The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.
…
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
7 Comments!
“…which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony…”
You mean Assistant Attorney General Perez is a f*cking liar??
^ Much like his boss….
***crickets***
The official response of the DoJ when asked about this, AND the response of the MSM on said subject.
Gonna be an interesting February, sounds like…
The only documents left in the DOJ after January, 2013 will be a folder entitled, “Standard Operating Procedures in case of Fire” !
OT, and I don’t care:
Who Needs Feminism?
(WARNING: Cannot unsee!)
IA! IA!