so…that

Mother Jones, the left-wing magazine that released a controversial video of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s remarks to a fundraiser in May, now admits that it has no full tape of what Romney said, and that its video is missing “one to two minutes” at the most important moment…

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

10 Comments!

  1. MikeG
    Posted September 19, 2012 at 6:15 am |

    Oh. I get it. The part they released did not do any damage to Romney. In fact many people agree with what was said. So of course there was more that we didn’t get to see, and of course it was way more awfuller than the rest. We just have to trust them that is was horrid.

    Right.

  2. geezerette
    Posted September 19, 2012 at 7:18 am |

    Cracking up here this morning watching Obama’s answer to this video on Letterman that he must have just seen because his answer was so unrehearsed and off the cuff. He looked like the hooker in the back seat chewing gum and gazing at her nails trying to convince her “john” that it was the first time she’s ever done that. Oh yes Obama– you’ve represented 100% of the citizens in this country since you were elected ahh huh–well than I feel much better knowing that. Must be me than I’m sure I’m wrong. Here he is the President of the Country he says he represents on the David Letterman show saying he represents us all —- very Presidential I’d say. All he needs is a fiddle and a gas mask.

  3. Colonel Jerry USMC
    Posted September 19, 2012 at 7:50 am |

    Another video tape with parts missing? Why——I never………..

  4. geezerette
    Posted September 19, 2012 at 7:52 am |

    My curiosity got the best of me about this Mother Jones stuff— hmmm– oh yes — could you say left wing??? I’m wondering if it’s lawful to go into someones private home and video tape a private conversation with out the persons knowledge or permission and than edit it and call it news. Is it??? Me I’d be pp’d off and have a lawyer by now. Just sayin’. Or do these fair and balanced Mother Jones’s have more rights than me in my own home?

  5. DougM (November is coming)
    Posted September 19, 2012 at 8:08 am |

    Surprised they haven’t accused Romney of trying to cover-up something, a la Nixon.

    Maybe … maybe the missing part contained a slight against The Prophet™, so they had to edit it.
    Yeah, that‘s the ticket.

  6. mojo
    Posted September 19, 2012 at 8:20 am |

    And it’s from… May?

  7. geezerette
    Posted September 19, 2012 at 9:23 am |

    ^^ mojo that’s why I tho’t the whole thing was so funny/sad. They’ve had it since May — lots of time to take care of things ya know? Delete a few min. of “stuff” that accidentally got left out. Than there he is on Letterman with his fools believing the whole thing. Makes us want to run around in circles and chase our tails. RRRRR

  8. mech
    Posted September 19, 2012 at 10:18 am |

    Things must be pretty bad if this is the big gun in the left’s arsenal against Mitt.

    The official figures back him up completely. The only thing missing is some more context which likely is the missing part. Yes, finding that would only make Mitt look even better.

    This isn’t a very good ‘big lie’. Even Rush suspected that it was meant for October but someone jumped the propaganda gun.

  9. geezerette
    Posted September 19, 2012 at 12:23 pm |

    The rehearsals went so good and everyone knew their lines so they tho’t what the heck get er out there.

  10. Annoying Mike
    Posted September 19, 2012 at 1:13 pm |

    How do you know a video is missing “one to two minutes” if you didn’t do the deleting of the footage?

    Think about it.

    If someone sent them an unsolicited video, how would they know how much was missing? You might see some breaks in continuity but you wouldn’t know how long the breaks were.

    Nobody has “tapes” any more. The video is digital.

target=