The most outrageous democrat “shenanigans” of the 2012 presidential election…
LOL! It’s a cover-up!
This morning, a legally credentialed poll watcher was threatened and intimidated while attempting to perform his legally allowed duties of observing the election process at precinct polling location 289 in Detroit. The poll watcher, a lawyer, was confronted by a voter in line, who demanded the poll watcher produce his credentials, which he did.
However, the voter said that wasn’t good enough and that he had “a badge and a gun” and told the poll watcher get out of the precinct. Rather than allow the situation to escalate, the poll watcher left before the voter produced a badge or brandished a gun. Fearing for his safety, the poll watcher exited and called 911, however the Detroit Police refused to respond to the call – neglecting the fact that a voter alleged to have a ‘badge’ and a ‘gun’ in a precinct…
DOH!
“A woman attempting to vote in West Boca Raton this morning was initially prohibited from entering the polling place because she was wearing a tee shirt with the letters MIT,” BocaNewsNow.com reports.
“BocaNewsNow.com has heard from multiple sources that an election supervisor at the polling place ultimately realized that MIT stands for “Massachusetts Institute of Technology” — a school where students tend to know how to spell…
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
12 Comments!
Was any reason given as to why the 911 call was ignored?
We’re taught in high school that voting is our right. We’re later told that it’s our duty. And then finally we discover that in New York it’s a waste of time, in Chicago it’s a joke, and in Philadelphia it’s a suicide attempt.
They are also taught in high school and universities to hate capitalism. Until of course they graduate and want to earn a living. She trusts Biden?????????? C’mon Man!!!! It’s so nice to have two great candidates to choose from. — (@;@)
What? I had a gun at MY polling location.
#1 Kinlaw: Yes, the person was calling about democrats breaking the law.
Had it been the other way around, I guarantee you this would have had a totally different outcome.
In front of me in the polling line this morning, a father was showing the ballot to his three little kids, maybe ages 10, 8, 7. After going over the whole thing in detail, all the kids said he should vote for the Green party candidate. All less than ten years old, and already politically brainwashed in school. We’re going to need a lot of bleach, some rip roaring brush clearing fires, and a long time to purge this filth.
Meanwhile,
The [genius] election supervisor at the polling place ultimately realized that MIT stands for “Massachusetts Institute of Technology” — a school where students tend to know how to spell … and that “Mitt” is spelled with two “t”s.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/report-woman-wearing-mit-shirt-barred-voting-florida_661853.html
What is it about Florida that makes having an election there so hard, anyway?
What is it about Florida that makes having an election there so hard, anyway?
Stupid asshole Democrats from New York and New Jersey, sometimes called snowbirds.
Foreign election officials amazed at trust-based U.S. voting system:
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/11/06/foreign_election_officials_amazed_by_trust_based_us_voting_system
Meanwhile, Eric Holder’s vote is safe — workers of his precinct have a photo-id of him, though of no one else:
http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2012/11/06/eric-holder-can-breathe-a-sigh-of-relief/
My wife called me with what “I” considered a funneh.
She went in to the polls planning to show her ID whether required or not.
Problem was, she didn’t show up as registered. The nice Lady asked her if she had by chance recently married, answer yes, and then tried under her Maiden name.
There she was, didn’t have the satisfaction of showing her ID, but got to vote.
Well, in Pensacola this morning, I had to show either two picture IDs or one pic ID and some form of document with both my name and address on it, and it didn’t piss me off in the slightest.
What DID raise my eyebrows, however, was this:
Local Elks Club on 72nd street allows two precincts to use its building for voting. BIG signs out front, letters maybe 10” high in solid black on white-painted plywood showing PRECINT 54 by one door and PRECINT 61 by another about 30 feet away. OVER the door are large posterboard signs with bold letters saying PRECINT 54 VOTES HERE and a similar sign with the number 61 over the other one.
So I get there just as the place is opening . . . Maybe 200 people waiting in line, 100 at each door. Get inside and find the appropriate A – E, F – L, M – R, S – Z lines and get in mine. About 15 people in front of me, and I can hear most of what is being said by the volunteer workers checking names against the registered voter lists.
Before I got up to the table, I heard at least half a dozen people being told “This area is for precinct 54. Your precinct is at the other end of the room. W. T. F. are those people doing voting for anything??
As I got my ballot and was looking for a booth to stand in to fill it out (we use the bubble style with special pens), I heard two guys being given driving directions to the locations of their precincts, one of which is like 10 miles away. W. T. F. F. are they doing voting!!
The ballot has several proposals, up through 12 minus #7, which require lots of reading. I had already looked over the sample ballot each registered voter gets in the mail and read up on all the proposals so I’d know what they’re about when I got to the booth. Didn’t bother to vote for any judges since I don’t know any of ‘em.
Ergo, filling out my ballot took maybe 2 minutes. One guy I saw at the head of the line when I got there — a hundred people ahead of me — was still standing in a booth reading the proposals as I put mine into the scanner and left. W. T. F. is he doing voting at the precinct and not by absentee or early ballot?????
Bocopro———— some time I wonder do the ones that know better not vote????