by the colors of their shirts, ye shall know them

I had trouble finding a sufficiently terse description for these jackasses.
I mean, how do you combine Klan, vigilante, Inquisition, Jacobin Committee of Public Safety, Brownshirts, Blackshirts, Cheka, Thuggees, etc. into a simple title? History is replete with soooo many examples of gangs whose ends justified vile means.

~ Auto-start video here. ~

• When guns are outlawed, only those ignoring the laws, invaders, and those making the laws will have guns.
You know, those against whom honest citizens need guns to protect themselves.
(see also: Second Amendment)
• In the land of the unarmed, the one-arm man is king.
(What? Yeah, hope those are original, but the odds are against it.)

18 Comments!

  1. dick, not quite dead white guy
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 9:54 am |

    a sufficiently terse description for these jackasses
    Uhbamunists?

  2. PeggyU
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 9:56 am |

    Bitter confiscators.

  3. mojo
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 10:34 am |

    OT: but cute

    3 year old girl gets to ride the TRAIN!

    (Oh my goodness!)

  4. DougM (Progophobe)
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 10:47 am |

    mojo ^
    Yep
    Threadbreaker!

    Back on topic:
    I was conflicted about including vigilantes, above, but it was included with the video/story. Vigilantes were, after all, merely enforcing the law (kind’a sort’a) in the absence of gov’t law enforcement. Abuses notwithstanding, I’m kind of a begrudging fan of the idea. (see also: unorganized collective self-defense and militia *snick*)

  5. PeggyU
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 10:51 am |

    New proposed Washington State legislation, walked onto the floor last night, would tax all components of ammunition. The revenue raised “could” go toward gun education (or what is probably more likely, for any pet project the liberals in Olympia want to fund). Our representative recommends contacting your legislators to voice your disapproval. Then do it again. And again. And again! Hound the shit out of them.

  6. mojo
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 10:55 am |

    I wouldn’t worry about the London “Vice patrols”, they’ll pick the wrong drunks to hassle at some point.

  7. DougM (Progophobe)
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 11:04 am |

    mojo ^
    But not, you know, wrong wrong.

  8. Posted February 6, 2013 at 12:23 pm |

    and said drunks will go to jail for being insufficiently sensitive to the beliefs and concerns of the Citizens of Asian Descent.

  9. mojo
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 1:06 pm |

    Maybe. These mooks tend to show up where there’s no cops around, for some reason. A quick beatdown shouldn’t attract many.

  10. accipiter NW
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 1:25 pm |

    I had heard in the Victorian era people were covering up the “immodest furniture” parts such as naked chair and table “legs”. That apparently was a myth or done more so to hide the cheapness of some of the parts. I wouldn’t be surprised if the goat shaggers in the vid actually would take to the idea if it ever occurred to them- might prevent a lot of bloodshed.

    Update related to last weeks Oak Harbor County Council- the councilman who felt intimidated by the private citizen and veteran and left the meeting will likely be avoiding all city parks and marinas as the gun ban in those areas was repealed. Congrats Louis Yonkman, Mayor Dudley, Oak Harbor.

  11. geezerette
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 2:17 pm |

    Soooo we know how they feel about alcohol but what do they think about pot? Pretty soon if not already.

  12. Caged Insanity
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 3:16 pm |

    We are quickly approaching (past perhaps?) a time when anonymity in public should be cause for a stop-n-search. Especially these asswipes that walk around in store and mall *inside* with their “hoodies” in hidey mode. Cops would catch a shit-ton of illegal guns if they could search these dicks running around like “they a bad ass gansta”

  13. JoeBandMember™
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 6:59 pm |

    Coming soon to America.

    Don’t believe me???

    How about 20 advanced technology F-16s and 200 M1 Abrams tanks the ObaMuslim is GIVING to the Jihadists in Egypt?

    Or the silence on this from both sides of the aisle in Congress?

    Or the drones that will soon be firing on opponents of The DalaiBama?

  14. Melissa In Texas
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 7:42 pm |

    *sigh*
    Will I be banned for saying…
    Bring it you F*cks?

  15. Caged Insanity
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 7:50 pm |

    Joe: Obama likes drones because he can hand pick the people who control them, and as such, drones do not disobey orders to kill innocent Americans.

    We don’t need to worry about whether or not our own military will turn on us, because they won’t even be in the equation

  16. Melissa In Texas
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 7:52 pm |

    *reaches for flyswatter and other means of protection…
    http://designworldonline.magnify.net/video/Air-Force-Bugbots;search%3AUS%20Air%20Force%20-%20MAV%27s

  17. DougM (Progophobe)
    Posted February 6, 2013 at 9:01 pm |

    Melissa ^
    Daniel Suarez “Kill Decision”
    When MAV swarms go wrong.

  18. ZZMike
    Posted February 8, 2013 at 7:42 pm |

    Fortunately, citizens of Formerly Great Britain are unarmed (as are most of the policemen), so none of that country’s “visitors” are likely to be harmed.

    In days gone by, a few large gentlemen (from the docks & such), equipped with cricket bats (& such), would make short work of these malcontents.

    Caged Insanity: Speaking of drones, why is it OK to kill Americans (even though traitorous) but not OK to waterboard others?