The framers didn’t envision women or black people voting.
But here we are.
Ye Olde Twytter
Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
14 Comments!
DougM (flawed)
Posted June 14, 2017 at 10:53 am |
Daemon
Posted June 14, 2017 at 1:57 pm |
I expect congressional security details will be up-arming. The two officers had to engage the shooter with pistols from about 100 feet. “Not a fair fight”, as a police spokesman put it.
While flipping channels, I came across the CBS team suggesting a highly charged partisan atmosphere was to blame. Ya think? It’s past time for the media to examine their role in creating that atmosphere. But that won’t happen. They’ll probably try to blame it on Trump and his “heated rhetoric”.
Buzz
Posted June 14, 2017 at 2:12 pm |
That whole “heated rhetoric” bullshit annoys the hell out of me.
Soros and his paid goons were the violent tinder at anything resembling Trump or Republican events.
8 years of law unenforcement and hating America were enough for most Americans, so they jumped for the candidate that pretended he was with them.
I wasn’t a Trump supporter, but it was pretty clear that Trump changing his party (and his money) from “D” to pretend “R” didn’t come without consequences from the entrenched communist Ds.
I paid like $700 for mine, where are these <$500 AR-15s?
Heck, you can't even get a WASR-10 (Romanian AK) for less than $500 anymore.
I demand he tell us where these AR-15s are!!!!!!!
stoo
Posted June 14, 2017 at 4:51 pm |
Problem is, Continental Congress almost bought 100 Belton Flintlocks – a single load, multiround firearm – in 1777. They decided Belton wanted too much money.
Here’s the correspondence between Belton and Congress.
Joe Bandmember ® ≠ "damn right I'm not equal to that" ™
Posted June 14, 2017 at 9:33 pm |
How is it that there was such piss poor security?
Was there inside “help”?
dick, not quite dead white guy
Posted June 14, 2017 at 10:35 pm |
Was there inside “help”?
I’d like to know how a no-name guy from Illinois knew there was a Republican Congressional practice at that little field, well outside of DC, so early in the morning.
I thought I read a lot, but I didn’t see anything about it.
One of those 90 out-of-work Dem staffers who left Chaffetz’s team in a huff?
$500??
$500 dollars was a ton of money back then!
We need federally subsidized AR-15 purchasing programs, basically a Second Amendment Care Act to help lower income prospective buyers.
Thanks Buzz, you learn something new every day.
The sale must have ended, it was $475 when I clicked.
Still under $500, I haven’t seen any scary black rifles for that cheap since before Obama.
rickn8or
Posted June 15, 2017 at 12:09 pm |
I’m just gonna go with The Mistress of Snark’s take on this:
The framers of the Constitution wanted individuals to be able to purchase and own what the Continental Army was using: Top of the line military 1780′s assault rifles.
Today’s Army uses M-4 rifles with burst fire selector switches, and belt-fed machineguns.
These are the weapons protected by the second amendment. Not your daddy’s Rem-chester deer rifle.
Disclaimer The opinions expressed here represent only their respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any of the other contributors to this website.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been pre-authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of political, economic, scientific, social, art, media, and cultural issues. The 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material that may exist on this site is provided for under U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with U.S. Code Title 17, Section 107, material on this site is distributed without profit to persons interested in such information for research and educational purposes. If you want to use any copyrighted material that may exist on this site for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
If you feel that any of the images used on this site infringe on YOUR rights, please contact me via the e-mail posted on this page and I will be more than happy to comply with your request and remove them.
All original photos and montages posted on this site are owned by me and marked to distinguish. They may not be used for any purpose without specific permission by me. PARTICULARLY the "Soni head" trademark.
You remain solely responsible for the content of your posted messages. Furthermore, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless the owners of this website, its staff, and its subsidiaries. The owners of this website also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any other related information collected on this service) in the event of a formal complaint or legal action arising from any situation caused by your use of this forum.
14 Comments!
I expect congressional security details will be up-arming. The two officers had to engage the shooter with pistols from about 100 feet. “Not a fair fight”, as a police spokesman put it.
While flipping channels, I came across the CBS team suggesting a highly charged partisan atmosphere was to blame. Ya think? It’s past time for the media to examine their role in creating that atmosphere. But that won’t happen. They’ll probably try to blame it on Trump and his “heated rhetoric”.
That whole “heated rhetoric” bullshit annoys the hell out of me.
Soros and his paid goons were the violent tinder at anything resembling Trump or Republican events.
8 years of law unenforcement and hating America were enough for most Americans, so they jumped for the candidate that pretended he was with them.
I wasn’t a Trump supporter, but it was pretty clear that Trump changing his party (and his money) from “D” to pretend “R” didn’t come without consequences from the entrenched communist Ds.
I’m OUTRAGED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I paid like $700 for mine, where are these <$500 AR-15s?
Heck, you can't even get a WASR-10 (Romanian AK) for less than $500 anymore.
I demand he tell us where these AR-15s are!!!!!!!
Problem is, Continental Congress almost bought 100 Belton Flintlocks – a single load, multiround firearm – in 1777. They decided Belton wanted too much money.
Here’s the correspondence between Belton and Congress.
^4
Veeshir – I’m with you … less than $500? Damn!
How is it that there was such piss poor security?
Was there inside “help”?
Was there inside “help”?
I’d like to know how a no-name guy from Illinois knew there was a Republican Congressional practice at that little field, well outside of DC, so early in the morning.
I thought I read a lot, but I didn’t see anything about it.
One of those 90 out-of-work Dem staffers who left Chaffetz’s team in a huff?
How does $399 sound, Veeshir?
https://www.rkguns.com/dpms-panther-oracle-223-5-56-ar-15-rifle.html
“Available for under $500″
$500??
$500 dollars was a ton of money back then!
We need federally subsidized AR-15 purchasing programs, basically a Second Amendment Care Act to help lower income prospective buyers.
Thanks Buzz, you learn something new every day.
The sale must have ended, it was $475 when I clicked.
Still under $500, I haven’t seen any scary black rifles for that cheap since before Obama.
I’m just gonna go with The Mistress of Snark’s take on this:
http://booksbikesboomsticks.blogspot.com/2017/06/softball.html
Check CDNN for black rifles at low price. They should have a pretty fair selection at or under 500. The market is glutted at this time.
The framers of the Constitution wanted individuals to be able to purchase and own what the Continental Army was using: Top of the line military 1780′s assault rifles.
Today’s Army uses M-4 rifles with burst fire selector switches, and belt-fed machineguns.
These are the weapons protected by the second amendment. Not your daddy’s Rem-chester deer rifle.