ToDaZeD CA *facepalm*


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. If by “progressive” she means that a bunch’a thugs are walkin’ the streets, now, because her jackassery got their convictions thrown out, then yeah

    Comment by DougM (speak three names) — September 9, 2019 @ 10:43 am

  2. I thot she meant “making Progress away from the Rule Of Law.”

    Comment by Claire: rebellious pink pig with car keys - and a *cause* — September 9, 2019 @ 12:08 pm

  3. ^ Progress: rule by arbitrary act of office in the furtherance of morally unassailable reasons

    Comment by DougM (speak three names) — September 9, 2019 @ 12:52 pm

  4. ^ aka, the Righteous Cause Fallacy.

    Comment by Nomen Nescio — September 9, 2019 @ 4:38 pm

  5. She calls herself, “smart on crime” and a “progressive prosecutor.”
    “Progressive” means she’s moving along in her social and career climbing, first fucking the boss, then pandering to race pimps and padding her cases closed numbers, doing nothing as a US Senator except kiss party boss asses, now pandering to more people looking for .gov freebies, slandering good people and telling bald-faced exaggerations and lies.
    Her polls are falling so I guess she’s not happy her upward “progression” is slowing.
    Suits me just fine. That couldn’t happen to a more deserving person. In fact, she deserves at least disbarment for her district attorney follies.

    Comment by dick, not quite dead white guy — September 9, 2019 @ 9:01 pm

  6. Nomen Nescio ^4
    You might enjoy this.
    It’s not a logical fallacy, but an interesting corollary

    Comment by DougM (speak three names) — September 10, 2019 @ 12:15 pm

  7. d,nqdwg, she’s gotta keep them old W/L numbers up.

    I’ve been watching her for years, and she fails the Second Amendment Test, so nothing else she does matters.

    Comment by rickn8or — September 10, 2019 @ 2:11 pm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.189 Powered by WordPress