theology 101: dietary laws

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. No free pork ribs with hot sauce???

    Comment by geezerette — June 14, 2012 @ 6:08 pm

  2. NEVER be a part of a religion that tells you what to eat.*
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    *Not the only reason for athiesm.

    Comment by Brad — June 14, 2012 @ 6:26 pm

  3. Keep your cult out of my mouth.

    Pretty much all diets are religion. The dictates are poorly explained, the followers are rabid, they contradict each other.

    Low-fat, low-carb, calorie-counters, sugar-busters, south beach or caveman. Not interested in being proselytized or having laws to enforce your religion on me.

    Comment by Merovign — June 14, 2012 @ 8:31 pm

  4. Any soup for them?

    Comment by mech — June 14, 2012 @ 8:32 pm

  5. ^ mech made me brush pipe ashes off my lap.

    UPDATE: Actually, that’s so good, I’m going to update the post with that.

    Comment by DougM (jackassophobe) — June 14, 2012 @ 9:00 pm

  6. Judging by the way liberals act, I’m beginning to think they subsist on a diet of anal sphincters.

    Comment by Jess — June 15, 2012 @ 2:59 am

  7. No soup and no fries either just cheeps.

    Comment by geezerette — June 15, 2012 @ 5:33 am

  8. …”I’m beginning to think they subsist on a diet of anal sphincters.”

    Jess, wouldn’t that be a form of cannibalism?

    Comment by rickn8or — June 15, 2012 @ 6:27 am

  9. “Concerned about your waistline?” No problem, strap on a *boob belt* (…elastic, capable of withstanding 2000 psi….) and eat!!

    {Please read small print; “Use caution when bending down to toilet seat. Explosive omni-directional fecal matter may exceed toilet dimensions”…}

    Comment by Colonel Jerry USMC — June 15, 2012 @ 7:28 am

  10. The Wookie and the man with the paper a$&hole are two good reasons to avoid vesting much power in government; a la Hayek, the people who rise to the top of government are likely to be combination of stupid, criminal, insane and arrogant (plus really ugly in the Wookie’s case).

    Comment by Steve in Greensboro — June 16, 2012 @ 8:32 am

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.476 Powered by WordPress