^ mojo (2)
Off’n the top of my head? Mmmm … tough.
Okay, *snick*

Heisenberg Uncertainty Polling: can’t measure both current opinions and trends simultaneously.
(see: push polling)

Pauli Polling Exclusion Principle: No two electors in the same ballot may #occupy the exact same swing states. That is, each elector in a ballot has a unique set of polling numbers.

Howzat?
[/quantumgeekness]

Comment by DougM (November is heeeeeere!) — November 6, 2012 @ 9:06 pm

Finally, a graphic that at least implies that the entire point of the Cat thought-experiment was Schrödinger complaining that the Cophenagen model is bollocks, rather than saying that The Cat is both alive and dead!

Actually, all it’s saying is that you cannot predict when an atom of a radioactive isotope is going to spit out a particle. It’s a statistical thing, and the limits of knowledge. A certain percentage of atoms will, in any given time period, but we can’t tell which precisely.

Same for Heisenberg, he just points out that the act of observation is an interaction. Basically, “Hey, you just bounced a high-energy photon (or whatever) off of that particle, so now we know where it used to be, but we don’t know where it isanymore. We changed it by looking.”

Like a good conservative….

I have to work in the morning….

Please, merciful father… let the* right* win!

Comment by Melissa In Texas — November 6, 2012 @ 8:20 pm

Ok, fine. Now explain the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle and the quantum exclusion theory.

“WANTED – For Quantum Indeterminacy. DEAD OR ALIVE”

Comment by mojo — November 6, 2012 @ 8:27 pm

^ mojo (2)

Off’n the top of my head? Mmmm … tough.

Okay, *snick*

Heisenberg Uncertainty Polling: can’t measure both current opinions and trends simultaneously.

(see: push polling)

~~Pauli~~Polling Exclusion Principle: No two electors in the same ballot may #occupy the exact same swing states. That is, each elector in a ballot has a unique set of polling numbers.Howzat?

[/quantumgeekness]

Comment by DougM (November is heeeeeere!) — November 6, 2012 @ 9:06 pm

Finally, a graphic that at least implies that the entire point of the Cat thought-experiment was Schrödinger complaining that the Cophenagen model

is bollocks, rather than saying that The Catisboth alive and dead!I approve.

Comment by Sigivald — November 7, 2012 @ 2:07 pm

Technically, I suppose you’re right – but: the Electoral College is going to vote Obama in. Heck, I don’t even know how many Electoral Votes he got.

At least, Rush &c have 4 years of plentiful material. Unless, of course, they declare him to be an Enemyof the People.

Comment by ZZMike — November 7, 2012 @ 8:03 pm

Actually, all it’s saying is that you cannot predict

whenan atom of a radioactive isotope is going to spit out a particle. It’s a statistical thing, and the limits of knowledge. A certain percentage of atoms will, in any given time period, but we can’t tell which precisely.Same for Heisenberg, he just points out that the act of observation is an interaction. Basically, “Hey, you just bounced a high-energy photon (or whatever) off of that particle, so now we know where it

used to be, but we don’t know where itisanymore. We changed it by looking.”Comment by mojo — November 8, 2012 @ 11:08 am