today’s audience participation
Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
0.539 Powered by WordPress
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
0.539 Powered by WordPress
Top and Bottom?
Comment by Wollf — November 27, 2012 @ 8:15 am
I wanna be “the biological entity generally known as”
Comment by mojo — November 27, 2012 @ 8:26 am
Why did Dr. Seuss pop into my mind?
.
.
.
Yeah, not very creative or PC today.
Comment by mech — November 27, 2012 @ 8:28 am
I remember the “debates” before the vote out here:
“Don’t worry, straights…we’re not going to change your marriages with our icky gay cooties. Not One Bit!
Uh huh…
Comment by Mumblix Grumph — November 27, 2012 @ 8:33 am
I OBJECT TO THE TERMS “SPOUSE A” AND “SPOUSE B” AS THE SEMANTICS CLEARLY SUGGEST A PRIORITY OR DOMINANCE ROLE OF ONE SPOUSE OVER THE OTHER.
THIS IS THE SHIT UP WITH WHICH AN ENLIGHTENED SOCIETY OF ENFORCED EQUALITY SHALL NOT PUT.
Comment by apotheosis — November 27, 2012 @ 8:56 am
How womaaaantic!
Comment by Claire — November 27, 2012 @ 9:45 am
One could be called Homo and the other Sexual.
Comment by Alan outback bacon czar — November 27, 2012 @ 10:02 am
I just talked to Spouse “F”. She’s doing fine.
Comment by Hog Whitman — November 27, 2012 @ 10:04 am
Spousal Unit THX-1138 _________
Spousal Unit THX-1139 _________
Bride/Groom (circle one) _________
Bride/Groom (circle one) _________
Pitcher _________
Catcher _________
Spouse 1 _________
Spouse 2 _________
Spouse 3 _________
Spouse 4 _________
(continue on reverse)
Male, Female, Neither, Varies (circle one or more)
If not Homo sapiens, enter species and breed _________
Comment by DougM (Well, thaaat sucked!) — November 27, 2012 @ 10:24 am
Set of chromosomes xx & xy
Set of chromosomes xx & xx
Set of chromosomes xy & xy
Set of Chromosomes xx or xy & Manufacturer _______ robot model _______ serial number _________
Comment by accipiter NW — November 27, 2012 @ 10:29 am
Claire, GMTA!
Comment by rickn8or — November 27, 2012 @ 11:08 am
“Convex” and “Concave” 1 & 2??
Comment by rickn8or — November 27, 2012 @ 11:09 am
The department is asking the public for suggestions…
How about “Go to hell.”
They could save space, thereby paper and ink (think green) with Man 1 and Man 2, Womyn 1 and Womyn 2.
No need to add a gender category.
BTW, why a gender category if they cannot reproduce?
Comment by dick, not quite dead white guy — November 27, 2012 @ 12:21 pm
Shim and hemale
Comment by Veranda — November 27, 2012 @ 1:24 pm
Innie and Outie?
Comment by mojo — November 27, 2012 @ 2:36 pm
Baby lemme be around your house tonight
Wrap your lock around my key
And twist it round just right…
– Teddy Bear, the forgotten lyrics
Comment by mojo — November 27, 2012 @ 2:40 pm
Sorta unrelated, but–
One weed garden, two alligators, a stripper and a pole.
It must be todaze Lympian.
Comment by iD — November 27, 2012 @ 5:53 pm
apotheosis (#5): How about “Spouse A and Spouse 1″.
But even the word “spouse” has questionable connotations.
Unfortunately, all my other suggestions would be unprintable and ill-received by the Department.
Comment by ZZMike — November 27, 2012 @ 6:02 pm
Spouse Up
Spouse Down
Spouse Charm
Buuut, that’s a quarky way of lookin’ at things.
Comment by DougM (Well, thaaat sucked!) — November 27, 2012 @ 6:52 pm
Attention: The Department of Redundant Redundancy has re-recently re-received your re-recent re-request. We’ll tha, tha think about it.
Comment by Hog Whitman — November 27, 2012 @ 7:07 pm
Doug, you forgot spouse strange to go with spouse charm.
(Apparently the first version went out to subscribers before the edit.)
Going with physics terms, strong force/weak force, pos/neg,
Spouse apple, spouse orange.
Sp. almond, sp. cashew.
sp. yin, sp. yang
sp. lead., sp. unlead.
jetsam & flotsammoving on now. . .
Comment by mech — November 27, 2012 @ 7:34 pm
???????????
Am I not the only one?
Comment by tctsunami — November 27, 2012 @ 7:42 pm
Despite all the BS, only man’s law has been changed.
God’s laws remain the same yesterday, today, and forever more.
Comment by JoeBandMember™ — November 27, 2012 @ 9:01 pm
On trying to change the definition of marriage: You can call a dog a cat if you want, but it’s still a dog.
Abraham Lincoln, way back When, (I think during a debate) was asked “How many legs on a dog?”
“Four”, he replied.
“Let’s call the tail a leg. Now how many?”
“Four. Just ’cause you call it a leg don’t make it so.”
Comment by ZZMike — November 28, 2012 @ 12:59 am
Oh, what a big amount of BS!!!!
Why not Bitch & Bitch?
(sorry, but this makes me very upset, when I hear this and see my soccer team going to Second Division)
Great day to y’all!!
Comment by Maria Edi — November 28, 2012 @ 3:58 am