today’s audience participation

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Top and Bottom?

    Comment by Wollf — November 27, 2012 @ 8:15 am

  2. I wanna be “the biological entity generally known as”

    Comment by mojo — November 27, 2012 @ 8:26 am

  3. Why did Dr. Seuss pop into my mind?

    .

    .

    .

    <
    Yeah, not very creative or PC today.

    Comment by mech — November 27, 2012 @ 8:28 am

  4. I remember the “debates” before the vote out here:
    “Don’t worry, straights…we’re not going to change your marriages with our icky gay cooties. Not One Bit!

    Uh huh…

    Comment by Mumblix Grumph — November 27, 2012 @ 8:33 am

  5. I OBJECT TO THE TERMS “SPOUSE A” AND “SPOUSE B” AS THE SEMANTICS CLEARLY SUGGEST A PRIORITY OR DOMINANCE ROLE OF ONE SPOUSE OVER THE OTHER.

    THIS IS THE SHIT UP WITH WHICH AN ENLIGHTENED SOCIETY OF ENFORCED EQUALITY SHALL NOT PUT.

    Comment by apotheosis — November 27, 2012 @ 8:56 am

  6. How womaaaantic!

    Comment by Claire — November 27, 2012 @ 9:45 am

  7. One could be called Homo and the other Sexual.

    Comment by Alan outback bacon czar — November 27, 2012 @ 10:02 am

  8. I just talked to Spouse “F”. She’s doing fine.

    Comment by Hog Whitman — November 27, 2012 @ 10:04 am

  9. Spousal Unit THX-1138 _________
    Spousal Unit THX-1139 _________

    Bride/Groom (circle one) _________
    Bride/Groom (circle one) _________

    Pitcher _________
    Catcher _________

    Spouse 1 _________
    Spouse 2 _________
    Spouse 3 _________
    Spouse 4 _________
    (continue on reverse)

    Male, Female, Neither, Varies (circle one or more)
    If not Homo sapiens, enter species and breed _________

    Comment by DougM (Well, thaaat sucked!) — November 27, 2012 @ 10:24 am

  10. Set of chromosomes xx & xy
    Set of chromosomes xx & xx
    Set of chromosomes xy & xy
    Set of Chromosomes xx or xy & Manufacturer _______ robot model _______ serial number _________

    Comment by accipiter NW — November 27, 2012 @ 10:29 am

  11. Claire, GMTA!

    Comment by rickn8or — November 27, 2012 @ 11:08 am

  12. “Convex” and “Concave” 1 & 2??

    Comment by rickn8or — November 27, 2012 @ 11:09 am

  13. The department is asking the public for suggestions…
    How about “Go to hell.”

    They could save space, thereby paper and ink (think green) with Man 1 and Man 2, Womyn 1 and Womyn 2.
    No need to add a gender category.
    BTW, why a gender category if they cannot reproduce?

    Comment by dick, not quite dead white guy — November 27, 2012 @ 12:21 pm

  14. Shim and hemale

    Comment by Veranda — November 27, 2012 @ 1:24 pm

  15. Innie and Outie?

    Comment by mojo — November 27, 2012 @ 2:36 pm

  16. Baby lemme be around your house tonight
    Wrap your lock around my key
    And twist it round just right…
    – Teddy Bear, the forgotten lyrics

    Comment by mojo — November 27, 2012 @ 2:40 pm

  17. Sorta unrelated, but–

    One weed garden, two alligators, a stripper and a pole.

    It must be todaze Lympian.

    Comment by iD — November 27, 2012 @ 5:53 pm

  18. apotheosis (#5): How about “Spouse A and Spouse 1″.

    But even the word “spouse” has questionable connotations.

    Unfortunately, all my other suggestions would be unprintable and ill-received by the Department.

    Comment by ZZMike — November 27, 2012 @ 6:02 pm

  19. Spouse Up
    Spouse Down
    Spouse Charm
    Buuut, that’s a quarky way of lookin’ at things.

    Comment by DougM (Well, thaaat sucked!) — November 27, 2012 @ 6:52 pm

  20. Attention: The Department of Redundant Redundancy has re-recently re-received your re-recent re-request. We’ll tha, tha think about it.

    Comment by Hog Whitman — November 27, 2012 @ 7:07 pm

  21. Doug, you forgot spouse strange to go with spouse charm.

    (Apparently the first version went out to subscribers before the edit.)

    Going with physics terms, strong force/weak force, pos/neg,

    Spouse apple, spouse orange.

    Sp. almond, sp. cashew.

    sp. yin, sp. yang

    sp. lead., sp. unlead.

    jetsam & flotsam

    moving on now. . .

    Comment by mech — November 27, 2012 @ 7:34 pm

  22. ???????????

    Am I not the only one?

    Comment by tctsunami — November 27, 2012 @ 7:42 pm

  23. Despite all the BS, only man’s law has been changed.

    God’s laws remain the same yesterday, today, and forever more.

    Comment by JoeBandMember™ — November 27, 2012 @ 9:01 pm

  24. On trying to change the definition of marriage: You can call a dog a cat if you want, but it’s still a dog.

    Abraham Lincoln, way back When, (I think during a debate) was asked “How many legs on a dog?”

    “Four”, he replied.

    “Let’s call the tail a leg. Now how many?”

    “Four. Just ’cause you call it a leg don’t make it so.”

    Comment by ZZMike — November 28, 2012 @ 12:59 am

  25. Oh, what a big amount of BS!!!!
    Why not Bitch & Bitch?
    (sorry, but this makes me very upset, when I hear this and see my soccer team going to Second Division)

    Great day to y’all!!

    Comment by Maria Edi — November 28, 2012 @ 3:58 am

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.180 Powered by WordPress