Sharia law: no more yeehaah of any kind*


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. With the outfit she is wearing, they may be right. But I’m not offended. I kind of like it. M in Texas, you want to try to duplicate that pose?

    Comment by Alan outback bacon czar — January 8, 2013 @ 9:34 am

  2. it is about “showing a woman’s curves.”

    So Sharrhea is like fashion designers.

    Comment by Claire: rebellious pink pig with car keys - and a *cause* — January 8, 2013 @ 9:59 am

  3. Apparently the 2004 tsunami clean out was ineffective.

    Teh crazies, like roaches, survived.

    Or maybe infested again from another location.

    Comment by mech — January 8, 2013 @ 10:57 am

  4. mech, get with the program. The Tsunami was Allah’s punishment for Indonesia not being strict enough. Now it seems that all along the women there have been on double secret probation.

    Comment by Steve Skubinna — January 8, 2013 @ 11:04 am

  5. She couldn’t sit behind me and hold on, but could I sit behind her and hold on?

    Just curious.

    Comment by Hog Whitman — January 8, 2013 @ 11:32 am

  6. What if she rode on the handle bar; izzat okeyfine?

    Comment by Colonel Jerry USMC — January 8, 2013 @ 11:43 am

  7. Not that I’m a great fan of this law and most other forms of public decency legislation, but the reporting on it in the Blaze link is factually incorrect.

    Of course the rule sounds absurd, because it is. It obviously makes it impossible for women to ride as passengers given that they cannot do so safely while perched side-saddle, their arms dangling to and fro. And, since straddling is the verboten act here, it is also makes it clear that women are now forbidden from actually driving themselves on motorbikes as well.

    No, it does not make that clear at all. The proposed law refers solely to female passengers, not to female drivers and the thrust of the rationalisation is more concerned with straddling and holding the driver than with the curves. Indonesian urban motorbikes tend to be scooters, anyway, which allow the driver to avoid straddling almost entirely. So while it is stupid, it is not the blanket ban on female mobility imagined by the overeager editor.

    Incidentally, side-saddle passenger riding is not uncommon in South-East Asia. You’ll see a lot of it e.g. in Vietnam, which is certainly unaffected by consideration for Muslim sensibilities.

    Comment by Yarbouti — January 8, 2013 @ 11:44 am

  8. Cute shoes.

    Comment by PeggyU — January 8, 2013 @ 11:49 am

  9. Side saddle bikes?

    Comment by geezerette — January 8, 2013 @ 12:04 pm

  10. Double-secret Booty Probation?

    Comment by mojo — January 8, 2013 @ 12:47 pm

  11. Whats that flapping noise?

    Comment by fel — January 8, 2013 @ 12:58 pm

  12. ^ That’s just Yarbouti.

    Comment by Mr. Death — January 8, 2013 @ 1:17 pm

  13. Sadly the whole religion needs a mental enema…

    Comment by TimO — January 8, 2013 @ 1:24 pm

  14. Geezus, Yarbouti, it’s a friggin’ joke!

    What are you, some kind’a CAIR agent who goes around disciplining infidels for making fun of the uncriticizable while wearin’ a “Behead Those Who Criticize Islam” t-thirt? You can kill us, but you can’t make us respect the absurd.

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — January 8, 2013 @ 1:27 pm

  15. Even if she wears pants?

    Comment by geezerette — January 8, 2013 @ 2:00 pm

  16. But can she straddle the driver? Can I volunteer to drive?

    Comment by TheOldMan — January 8, 2013 @ 3:19 pm

  17. Now just which position is preferable for the woman on a motorcycle?

    Comment by mech — January 8, 2013 @ 3:29 pm

  18. Well, I’m gonna pretend it’s Melissa…

    Comment by rickn8or — January 8, 2013 @ 3:36 pm

  19. Be still my beating heart! If I saw a girl with THOSE legs riding a motorcycle that way it could cause me to auger in.

    No, don’t ban them. Those were God given legs and well, it sure gladdens the heart of us older folk!

    Comment by Paul — January 8, 2013 @ 5:17 pm

  20. Paul, us younger guys like ‘em too.

    Comment by rickn8or — January 8, 2013 @ 6:23 pm

  21. Goats cans still ride spread eagle though.

    Comment by JoeBandMember™ — January 8, 2013 @ 7:31 pm

  22. Comment by iD — January 8, 2013 @ 8:04 pm

  23. Therein lies the muzzies’ problem, Paul.
    You see those fine legs, you want those fine legs, you shame those fine legs.

    Comment by Buzz — January 8, 2013 @ 8:06 pm

  24. iD (22)
    Not sure of the translation on that tub,
    but I think it says “baby food.”

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — January 8, 2013 @ 9:58 pm

  25. DougM, if so, then either interpretation of that phrase would be accurate.

    Comment by rickn8or — January 8, 2013 @ 10:02 pm

  26. Doug M – Bucket o’ baby

    Comment by PeggyU — January 8, 2013 @ 10:04 pm

  27. ^ LOL@everyone.

    Comment by SondraK, Queen of my domain — January 8, 2013 @ 10:13 pm

  28. Kentucky Flied Chillin’

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — January 8, 2013 @ 11:42 pm

  29. ^ diaper lickin’ good

    Comment by PeggyU — January 9, 2013 @ 12:50 am

  30. #8, Peggy U: I noticed the shoes too – yeah, they are cute.

    Comment by Thunderbottom — January 9, 2013 @ 6:30 am

  31. She’s wearing a helmet.
    When I rode in short skirts, I always had the wind in my hair and usually higher heels, and I was riding bitch on the back.
    No, I no longer have pics of that stage in my life ;)
    Some days, when the sun is out and it is warm… I miss it!
    That being said, the people can screw the animal of their choosing, but a woman’s LEGS bring out the sharia nuts?
    *shakes head*
    not wearing a damn burkha!

    Comment by Melissa In Texas — January 9, 2013 @ 5:59 pm

  32. No, I no longer have pics of that stage in my life…”

    Damn. Just. Damn.

    Comment by rickn8or — January 9, 2013 @ 6:18 pm

  33. Melissa (31)
    Are you “not wearing a burkha” right now?
    (What? Hey, she said it, not me!)

    [*heh* I love the English language.]

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — January 9, 2013 @ 9:01 pm

  34. Melissa in Texas: Thanks. You just ruined the rest of my afternoon. I was previously going to get up and go do something. I forget what it was. Now? Not so much.

    Comment by Hog Whitman — January 12, 2013 @ 2:47 pm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.220 Powered by WordPress