fair winds and following seas

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. … thereby saving countless birds
    and tax money.

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — January 30, 2013 @ 12:56 pm

  2. It is to laff.

    That’s kinda like buildin a ship outta adobe and tryin to operate it off Hatteras.

    Comment by bocopro — January 30, 2013 @ 1:02 pm

  3. Wind power at it’s best.

    Comment by geezerette — January 30, 2013 @ 1:06 pm

  4. The guy in the middle…scratching his head…..owie.

    Comment by SondraK, Queen of my domain — January 30, 2013 @ 1:15 pm

  5. What was that again? “… gale force gusts of 50mph …?

    Sorry, but I’ve lived in places where that’s little better than a stiff breeze.

    (So I guess it’s no wind power on the Gulf coast.)

    Comment by Lord of the Fleas — January 30, 2013 @ 1:31 pm

  6. Sic semper birdblenders!

    Comment by Merovign — January 30, 2013 @ 1:37 pm

  7. Viewing this demonstration of ‘safe’ harnessing of wind; it’s probably best these energy companies stay away from nuclear power.

    Comment by danintampa — January 30, 2013 @ 1:48 pm

  8. “gale force gusts of 50mph”

    The news source is the Telegraph in England.

    Shouldn’t they be using kph?

    Comment by Caged Insanity — January 30, 2013 @ 2:14 pm

  9. Time to have a sit-down with the fellers who specified, provided, and torqued the base bolts.

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — January 30, 2013 @ 2:14 pm

  10. ^^Probably got an award for using recycled bolts.

    50 MPH shouldn’t be a breaking wind. . .

    Other areas of the “shires” with stone churches and houses in “dingly dells” are also inappropriate for wind, he said.

    Comment by mech — January 30, 2013 @ 2:42 pm

  11. There’s a point where the blade speed can cause all types of havoc and automatic safeties are supposed to kick in and stop the blades. If they don’t, either the damn thing will come apart or fall down.

    Comment by Jess — January 30, 2013 @ 2:58 pm

  12. That’s not a wind, just a good stiff breeze. Smells like opportunists cashing in on the Green Subsidy or whatever euphemism GB uses for the scam where you get govt grants for green energy bullshit, skim off the cash up front, and go bankrupt a few years later
    (See: Solyndra)
    The incident is right in line with Progs’ tendency to ignore facts, logic and plain arithmetic if it doesn’t suit their template, then blame conservatives for whatever goes wrong [see today's news: Economy Shrinks: Dems Blame GOP]

    Comment by dick, not quite dead white guy — January 30, 2013 @ 2:59 pm

  13. They set the prop blades to turn at low wind speeds. Spooling it up to 50 mph rpm creates a lot of drag. And w a 6 story moment arm the bolts prolly need to be long enuf so the threads come out the other side of the earth, where they screw on the washer an nuts….Plus, unless the wind hits the prop at a perpendicular angle, you got to figure in the “P-Factor” (…where, say, the downward half of the propellor is generating less lift than the upward half of the propellor…) In a prop aircraft, this is why pilots have to add right rudder when rotating the plane at liftoff speed on the runway.

    Comment by Colonel Jerry USMC — January 30, 2013 @ 3:27 pm

  14. “I found a pail of unused Nuts, Boss”, said no Union worker ever.

    It’s probably the Republican’s fault anyways…..

    Comment by Wollf — January 30, 2013 @ 3:28 pm

  15. Shouldn’t they be using kph?

    I believe the current term of measurement in Old Blighty is “furlongs per fortnight.”

    Comment by Steve Skubinna — January 30, 2013 @ 3:50 pm

  16. Then again,
    mebbe it got hit by one bigass bird.

    ‘Course, since it’s in the UK, it could’a been that they torqued the bolts to the left ‘stead’a right.
    (What? Yeah, but in Oz, that’d be “counter-clockwisy tighty, clockwisy-loosy,” woodnit?)

    Hey, wait …
    any chance the torque specs were in pound-foot rather than newton-meter … or t’other way ’round?

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — January 30, 2013 @ 4:15 pm

  17. Well, folks, I’m still trying to find me one supporter, one wind power company, one anybody who can quote me a price per KWH of wind power.

    Each windmill generates DC, which is then filtered, inverted into a fake AC sine wave which is hard on anything AC, synchronized with the grid sine wave, and then backfed into a transformer stepping the voltage up to whatever the local grid rubs at.

    Maybe that’s why all the supporters and wind utilities yell at me when I ask the price.

    Comment by JoeBandMember™ — January 30, 2013 @ 6:29 pm

  18. Doug – Bigass bird? Like this one?

    Comment by PeggyU — January 30, 2013 @ 7:20 pm

  19. Sometimes they just add to the carbon footprint on their own….

    Comment by TimO — January 31, 2013 @ 7:25 am

  20. or this…

    In an unfolding plot that is part “The Sopranos,” part “An Inconvenient Truth,” authorities swept across Sicily last month in the latest wave of sting operations revealing years of deep infiltration into the renewable-energy sector by Italy’s rapidly modernizing crime families.*

    Comment by Claire: rebellious pink pig with car keys - and a *cause* — January 31, 2013 @ 8:17 am

  21. Pity Al Gore was not inspecting that wind generator when it fell over.

    I can see him at the top of the six story generator and it starts swaying in the 50 MPH wind.

    Maybe Aljazeera would save him.

    Comment by Paul — January 31, 2013 @ 8:49 pm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.178 Powered by WordPress