there’s a word for this

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Good. Now he can fire half his cabinet, hire an honest Attorney General, instruct them to root out criminal acts, and prosecute any cabinet official operating outside the law.

    After that, he can resign for failing to uphold the law to this point.

    Comment by Jess — January 31, 2013 @ 11:17 am

  2. Gee .. that includes selling guns to Mexican criminals, appointing people to leadership positions without bothering with congressional approval, locking up oil shale lands in Utah by declaring a huge chunk of the stat a National Monument, again, without congressional approval?

    I could go on here …

    Comment by Kristophr — January 31, 2013 @ 12:16 pm

  3. My favorite was preventing Jindal from cleaning up oil slicks by declaring the 95% clean water coming out of oil skimmers to be “pollution”.

    This despite a Supreme court decision that mining suction sluices do not cause pollution because anything that goes through them came out of the body of water originally …

    Comment by Kristophr — January 31, 2013 @ 12:19 pm

  4. “Sorry, we’re full up with Louis 14′s this year. Could you be Edward the Fourth instead?”

    Comment by mojo — January 31, 2013 @ 1:45 pm

  5. One word title …
    The Man Who Would be King
    (What? Well, it’s a great movie — a story of how to get ahead in the world.)

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — January 31, 2013 @ 1:50 pm

  6. Appears a editor missed a word there . . . shouldn’t that be “I am not yet a king”?

    Comment by bocopro — January 31, 2013 @ 2:00 pm

  7. Its easy to say that when you’ve got your auto pen sitting on a stack of executive orders

    Comment by Gwillie — January 31, 2013 @ 4:02 pm

  8. Did anyone figure out which law he was talking about? I can’t figure out what he meant. Does he mean they have no parking tickets? Did they follow an obscure waterways code? Because as a general rule, the statement doesn’t seem to be true.

    Comment by Merovign — January 31, 2013 @ 6:28 pm

  9. What he meant to say was, “We are a king”. The royal “we” applies to his highness, King Skeeter I. Using a simple “I” would not convey the presence of the State within the man…

    We need to get used to our role as subjects and all hail King Skeeter!

    Comment by Rededmonds — January 31, 2013 @ 7:01 pm

  10. Well, lawsy, lawsy. I swan! Wheah IS mah mand!

    I know’d dat. An’ me a Inglish teecher fer fi’teen y’ar.

    How imbarasin!

    Yep. All hail King Skeeter!!

    Love it.

    Comment by bocopro — January 31, 2013 @ 7:07 pm

  11. Two words:
    Liar
    Impeachable

    Comment by dick, not quite dead white guy — January 31, 2013 @ 9:26 pm

  12. Rededmonds (9)
    Skeeter the First !!!
    [lays aside laptop to recover seegar *ptooied* across the room]

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — January 31, 2013 @ 9:48 pm

  13. (8) Merovign,

    I am thinking he thinks he is the law and follows himself in the mirror.

    Comment by mech — January 31, 2013 @ 10:41 pm

  14. Thanks Doug — great crown image!

    There will also need to be an orb and scepter insignia for King Skeeter’s dominion.

    http://image.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/1143878/111247727/stock-photo-pink-putter-with-ball-111247727.jpg

    Comment by Rededmonds — January 31, 2013 @ 11:20 pm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.163 Powered by WordPress