so there’s that

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Too bad the assholes at Gawker and the Post-Journal already did their damage.

    Comment by Steve Skubinna — February 5, 2013 @ 11:33 am

  2. Now my f’ing doctor ask me if I had any guns in my house. I ask him why he would want to know that, and he said the Guv’mit makes him ask. I wonder how many straight answers he gets.

    Comment by Alan outback bacon czar — February 5, 2013 @ 11:52 am

  3. The courts balked at releasing the records because it is New York City, where the only people who get gun permits are the well connected. Can’t let the peasants see who is armed in the city.

    Comment by Steve_in_CA — February 5, 2013 @ 1:08 pm

  4. ^Alan (2) ,
    My doc asked that on my first medicare physical, and I declined to answer. I’ve since stopped taking Medicare physicals, and get the same tests by complaining of certain ailments in a timely fashion.

    Comment by dick, not quite dead white guy — February 5, 2013 @ 1:43 pm

  5. If the NY Times is shot down asking for gun data, is it a gun crime?
    *fukew*fukew*fukew*

    Comment by dick, not quite dead white guy — February 5, 2013 @ 1:45 pm

  6. Yeah, my Doc asked me if I owned a gun. I replied truthfully,”No, I do not own a gun.”

    Who the hell would only own “A” gun?

    Comment by Wollf — February 5, 2013 @ 2:27 pm

  7. Who the hell would only own “A” gun?

    Maybe one of them moderates I keep hearing about. I’ve been told I don’t do moderation very well.

    Comment by Hank — February 5, 2013 @ 2:44 pm

  8. “None of your business.”
    “I’m required to ask.”
    “Fine. That’s the answer.”

    Comment by mojo — February 5, 2013 @ 2:58 pm

  9. “I’m required to ask.”
    “Do you own a gun, Doc? Am I required to answer? Show me the directive. Oh, never mind, Doc. The answer is ‘Nunayadangbusiness.’ Yeah, you can write that down.”

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — February 5, 2013 @ 3:58 pm

  10. This is precisely why the gummint cannot be trusted with who owns what guns and is allowed to carry them in public.

    Comment by rickn8or — February 5, 2013 @ 6:10 pm

  11. “I’m sorry doctor, but since the government has seen fit to turn the medical profession into proxy political snoops, I cannot answer *any* questions not directly related to the complaint I’m seeing you about today.”

    Comment by Merovign — February 5, 2013 @ 6:52 pm

  12. My my, how interesting

    Comment by mojo — February 5, 2013 @ 8:16 pm

  13. The problem with the gun question is that if you even so much as bat an eye when they ask, they will assume that no matter what comes out of your mouth, the answer is “yes”, and if you say “no” they’ll mark you down as a liar.

    This is the United States of America. Where all are guilt until proven guilty (unless you are black, then you are innocent until proven innocent)

    Comment by Caged Insanity — February 5, 2013 @ 8:24 pm

  14. mojo, some model.

    Comment by rickn8or — February 5, 2013 @ 9:36 pm

  15. They’re comparing against a firearms registration DB that they are not supposed to have. And which is necessarily incomplete.

    Will anybody notice, ya think?

    Comment by mojo — February 6, 2013 @ 8:10 am

  16. mojo,
    I notice that their problem is funding.
    Money wouldn’t be a problem, if they sold the confiscated firearms to non-prohibited citizens.
    Or the Feds could buy ‘em and give ‘em to those who can’t afford guns.
    You know, Obamaguns.
    Hey, think of it as “redistribution.”

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — February 6, 2013 @ 8:48 am

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.169 Powered by WordPress