every move you fake

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Why would the NY Times lie about electric cars? It seems the left would side with anything that is against “big” oil and helps against global warming.

    I have a friend that owns an extended range Model S, loves it… except that it accelerates so unbelievably fast. Zero to sixty in four and a half seconds. Okay, he loves the acceleration, but he is worried about it. His insurance company told him that if he gets one speeding ticket with this car his insurance rates will double.

    He has solar panels on his house, he says he pays no fuel costs and that makes him very happy. He just uses the car to get to work and around town. He knows he can’t use it for long trips but doesn’t care, it isn’t what he wants to use it for.

    Comment by Just Sayin' — February 12, 2013 @ 6:33 am

  2. :))) I’m getting ready to meet the “girls” for coffee– this is perfect!! We drink ours– just to clear that up. The statement not our systems.

    Comment by geezerette — February 12, 2013 @ 7:15 am

  3. Take a long detour? Yeah, because nobody would even decide to go anywhere on impulse.

    Statists love mass transit for the same reason they love gun control. It’s the control part, although not as obvious with mass transit. But it lets them determine where you can travel, and the timing of it. If they can’t shoehorn us into the trams and subways, the next best alternative is an electric car so we are tied down. You won’t elect to take a road trip with a bunch of friend if your set of wheel can only go a hundred miles and then needs eight hours ot recharge.

    Comment by Steve Skubinna — February 12, 2013 @ 7:46 am

  4. I’m spring-loaded to distrust the NYT, but I’d like to see the data.
    [flashback: picking through data printouts during countdown]

    If the NYT did falsify (misrepresent) this test, then it’s disturbing on at least two counts:
    • They exhibited a fundamental dishonesty to and contempt for their readers (their specific objective is almost immaterial).
    • They exhibited a fundamental ignorance of the technology they feel entitled to pass judgment on (arrogance by the reporter, poor management in assigning the wrong reporter, or a shortcoming in j-school preparation).

    Offhand, that sounds like Prog standard operations.

    If Tesla’s lying, we’ll soon know.

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — February 12, 2013 @ 8:44 am

  5. Shorter NYT: “Overpriced CRAP!”

    Comment by mojo — February 12, 2013 @ 10:42 am

  6. mojo, as I said above I have a friend that owns one.
    Over priced, yes. You are paying for the batteries, but he doesn’t pay for fuel or for regular maintenance. No oil changes, no fluids to worry about. His solar panels fuel the vehicle.
    Crap? Not at all. It is a really nice car.
    http://www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/car/1301_2013_motor_trend_car_of_the_year_tesla_model_s/viewall.html#ixzz2CRTH248r

    This car is his mid-life crisis car. You might say it sucks, but given the chance you would drive one.

    Comment by Just Sayin' — February 12, 2013 @ 12:04 pm

  7. Tesla and NYT deserve each other. May they consume each other.

    Who wants to sit for an hour to charge their vehicle at a “supercharger?” Ridiculous!

    The whole reason electric cars died 100 years ago was this charging problem. It can’t get fixed. There are far better alternatives.

    …and electric power doesn’t REALLY come from pixie dust.

    Comment by Hopefulone — February 12, 2013 @ 12:31 pm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.159 Powered by WordPress