awfercyinoutloud (cont’d)


RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Raise minimum wage, force small business to purchase health care if they grow, force business to hire criminals.
    If I didn’t know how much the Obama administration cared about us I would think they were deliberately trying to sabotage small business. Good thing he doesn’t give tax breaks to companies like GE, Google and Facebook.

    Comment by Fartyfar — February 17, 2013 @ 8:26 am

  2. I would think that if the applicant is a registered democrat or ever voted for obama that would meet the EEOC’s definition of a criminal.

    Comment by tctsunami — February 17, 2013 @ 8:33 am


    Comment by Stick — February 17, 2013 @ 8:46 am

  4. We don’t want too many deterrents to crime, now do we?

    Comment by logdogsmith — February 17, 2013 @ 9:13 am

  5. I think this proves that government is way too small.

    Comment by SondraK, Queen of my domain — February 17, 2013 @ 9:14 am

  6. I wonder. What would be the best city in which to hold a Constitutional Convention?

    Comment by Walt — February 17, 2013 @ 10:00 am

  7. Now, let’s look at Congressional staff hiring practices.
    (What? Secret Service, too?)

    Comment by DougM (Progophobe) — February 17, 2013 @ 10:05 am

  8. (5) SondraK

    Funny you should mention that.

    Comment by s2 — February 17, 2013 @ 10:21 am

  9. That came to light when the EEOC took action against G4S Secure Solutions, which provides guards for nuclear power plants and other sensitive sites, for refusing to hire a twice-convicted thief as a security guard — even though Pennsylvania state law forbids hiring people with felony convictions as security officers.

    Yeah, yeah. I know. “To catch a thief, set a thief” and all that. But the “logical” conclusion is that we can no longer bar convicted child molesters from working at day care centers.

    Comment by rickn8or — February 17, 2013 @ 10:21 am

  10. So much for what is not enumerated for the Feds is reserved for the states or the people.
    I looked at s2′s link. George Washington’s government had 1 Fed employee per 2500 citizens.
    Uhbama’s government fiefdom has 1 employee per 144 citizens.
    If we include the military at 1.5 million, which is now very much a standing army, plus Centcom contractors at 137,000 and the post office at 574,000, we have
    1 Fed employee per 71 citizens.
    No wonder we’re more than broke.

    Comment by dick, not quite dead white guy — February 17, 2013 @ 10:57 am

  11. Illegalize everything and the government owns everybody.

    “…it could be guilty of ‘race discrimination’?” Is there now a *criminal* race???

    Comment by Hopefulone — February 17, 2013 @ 12:02 pm

  12. So this means the end of the Lautenberg Amendment, right?

    Comment by Steve Skubinna — February 17, 2013 @ 12:13 pm

  13. As noted in the article (and as is so often the case in government), their race-based “guidance” may end up harming the honest members of those very classes.

    As for numbers of government “workers” – add in state, county, and municipal employees for a real eye-opener.

    Comment by MaxRedline — February 17, 2013 @ 12:32 pm

  14. Slightly off-topic, but I noticed in the original post, the Barack-ack-ack Obama regime is called “administration”. If, by “administration”, you mean it in the sense of, “administer an enema: high, hot and helluva lot”, then yes, it’s an administration. But for simplicity, I prefer to call it a regime, in the sense of, “The Obama regime: The People’s monarchy since 2008″

    Comment by Karl Uppiano — February 17, 2013 @ 12:45 pm

  15. The EEOC says it should be a federal crime to refuse to hire ex-convicts

    Congresscritters are just trying to make sure they can find jobs if/when they leave office. Can’t have perspective employers checking up on whether they had sex with underage Dominican prostitutes, for example.

    Comment by Fat Baxter — February 17, 2013 @ 2:51 pm

  16. Fat Baxter– what the hell do they need jobs for?? They are paid for life and have life time benefits. I’d like to try to “get along” on what our taxes pay them.

    Comment by geezerette — February 17, 2013 @ 5:43 pm

  17. So, wait, is it or isn’t it still racist to say most criminals are minorities? Or is it only racism if you’re not a progressive bucreaucrat/thug?

    Really, really over-the-top tired of the self-righteousness of bureaucrats. You’re servants not masters, that means you ask, you don’t order.

    Comment by Merovign — February 17, 2013 @ 11:57 pm

  18. “…even though Pennsylvania state law forbids hiring people with felony convictions as security officers.”

    There is the proper response to EEOC:

    “Pennsylvania state law forbids…”
    You got a problem with that? Don’t talk to me; talk to the Governor!”

    Comment by Lucius Severus Pertinax — February 18, 2013 @ 2:33 am

  19. Ever heard of a “negligent hiring” case?
    I’m just sayin’.
    Think about it.

    Comment by Trialdog — February 18, 2013 @ 6:59 am

  20. Hot damn! All the recidivist prone pedophiles can get jobs in day care. Now that’s an opportunity!

    Comment by dick, not quite dead white guy — February 18, 2013 @ 9:37 am

  21. Does this require that the Los Angeles Police Department be required to hire Charles Manson as a patrolman should he be paroled? Maybe a twice convicted bank robber get a job as a vault teller at Bank of America?

    Comment by Chuck from Tacoma — February 18, 2013 @ 7:44 pm

  22. In England (before it became Formerly Great Britain), during WW II, there was a ministry of employment that decided who was going to work, and where. If you needed to hire someone, you sent the Ministry a note, then they sent someone around, and you hired him.

    It greatly simplified job searches. Here’s a clip from an article about it:

    “Regulation 58A of the Defense (General) Regulations” (which empowered the Minister of Labour and National Service to direct any person to perform services of which he is capable anywhere in the Nation),”

    Employment Security in Great Britain During the First 14 Months of the War

    On the other hand, those were meaner times in FGB.

    Comment by ZZMike — February 18, 2013 @ 8:44 pm

  23. Don’t be shocked when the Democrats try to allow felons to vote to.

    After that, the asylum will be ran, literally, by the inmates.

    Comment by Paul — February 18, 2013 @ 9:56 pm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.212 Powered by WordPress