RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. No doubt everyone was too busy snickering.

    Comment by Fawkes News (Blacklisted and Loving It) — March 27, 2014 @ 4:34 am

  2. Perhaps they were a tad miffed at getting a nonsensical answer to a serious question.

    Comment by The Digital Hairshirt — March 27, 2014 @ 5:00 am

  3. The entire world knows he’s a joke.

    Well, except for about half of the people in the US.

    Comment by Caged Insanity — March 27, 2014 @ 6:18 am

  4. LMAO! I thought for sure it was going to be a vid of him meeting with the Pope but that hasn’t happened yet.

    Comment by SondraK, bossy nagger — March 27, 2014 @ 7:05 am

  5. Actually, there were like four or five pitifully faint claps from somebody.
    Kripes, it was like a movie scene where a speaker ends up with a fake grin, moving his eyes back and forth and sweating.

    Reminded me of this joke.

    (What? Yeah, no-applause could’a been the groundrule for the session.)

    Comment by DougM (Bison Party) — March 27, 2014 @ 7:09 am

  6. Yannow, we’re all a bunch of dummies.
    No one else clapped because they all fainted.

    Comment by SondraK, bossy nagger — March 27, 2014 @ 7:10 am

  7. The applause sign was stuck in the luggage of the SS agents who were sent home.

    Comment by mech — March 27, 2014 @ 7:20 am

  8. ^^ Okay, faint applause it is.

    Comment by DougM (Bison Party) — March 27, 2014 @ 7:29 am

  9. The sound of one hand clapping?

    Comment by Alan the outback bacon czar — March 27, 2014 @ 8:06 am

  10. That’s progress, a step in the right direction. He’s gone from:
    crowd adulation/fainting->scripted cherry picked audience->polite applause->one hand clapping->

    I’m waiting for ->jeer him->throw shoes->rush the podium and beat him->tar and feathers->handcuffs and frogwalk

    Comment by dick, not quite dead white guy — March 27, 2014 @ 10:17 am

  11. Fact Jack: That entire nation is racist!!!!!!

    Comment by Colonel Jerry USMC — March 27, 2014 @ 2:47 pm

  12. He mentioned the Rule of Law. Since he’s a reknowned Constitutional Scholar (koff, koff), he really should know what that means.

    Most all of what he’s done regarding the [Un]Affordable Care Act has been contrary to the Rule of Law.

    What do we mean by “rule of law”?

    In short, the rule of law is a system of government in which a society adopts or maintains a set of good, just, and fair laws by which it and its government will be governed. The nasty alternative to such a system, of course, is one in which the government can do whatever it wants and the people have no way to refuse laws that they don’t think are good, just, or fair.

    Comment by ZZMike — March 28, 2014 @ 5:11 pm

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.207 Powered by WordPress